Talk:Badnjak (Serbian)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am reviewing this article. Cirt (talk) 09:40, 31 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Image and Stability review (completed) Cirt (talk) 02:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Image review

One image used, image is from Wikimedia Commons, image page at Commons checks out okay. Passes here. Cirt (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stability review

No issues on inspection of talk page history. Article edit history is fine going back a few months. Passes here. Cirt (talk) 10:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review note: More coming soon. Cirt (talk) 02:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nomination on hold

This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of January 8, 2009, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:

The WP:LEAD section is one big paragraph. Recommend breaking that up into two, perhaps three, shorter paragraphs.
There are some language and syntax issues throughout that need to be addressed.
- I would suggest posting to the talk pages of the relevant WikiProjects for assistance from third-party, previously uninvolved editors, in order to get some fresh eyes on the text of the article.
- I would also recommend trying to get some folks from WP:GOCE to improve the readability and flow of the article.

2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout. However, it is preferable to have cites at the end of sentences as opposed to at the end of paragraphs - this is okay for now but something to think about working on further going forward.

3. Broad in coverage?: Very nice, I especially like the Interpretation subsection. Any possibility of a Further reading and/or External links subsection?

4. Neutral point of view?: Written in a matter of fact, neutral tone throughout. Passes here.

5. Article stability? See above. Passes here.

6. Images?: See above. Passes here.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 05:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Answers:

1.

Fixed
I posted a request on WP:GOCE - surely fresh eyes are always welcome. Could you please give me examples of not well readable or not well flowing places in the text?

2. Fixed. (For the paragraphs that are referenced only at the end, the whole text comes from that reference.)

3. Thanks. As for Further reading and/or External links, the books and web pages given in the References section can well serve this purpose, because in almost all of them more details and intricacies regarding local customs with the badnjak are given. VVVladimir (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked Cirt for a reassessment. Hopefully the article will be promoted. --Glubbdrubb (talk) 12:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. VVVladimir (talk) 13:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will take another look soon. Cirt (talk) 14:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Pass

The article is improved. Thanks for responding to my above comments. Cirt (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Cirt. VVVladimir (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:-) --Glubbdrubb (talk) 13:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]