Talk:Badlands Guardian

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 December 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Badlands Guardian is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Alberta / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

plagiarism

The stuff in the second paragraph is lifted directly from one of the listed sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.207.22 (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Don't speedy delete that perspective image —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.25.243 (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no symbols as to where this place is, where these Badlands are, etc, etc. Grill 16:21, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm okay

Considering the nature of this article, wouldn't it be appropriate to include a picture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.17.2 (talk) 14:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC) In answer to your question about a picture being added. If you look in the history of the page someone tried to ad as far as I know the only available picture and Wikipedia took it off for some reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.110.243.73 (talk) 15:51, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is useless without a picture. 75.75.110.235 (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The google maps link should point about 4km ESE of where it does. That link just looks at a hill! Pie fed (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete

This article has 7 citations, 4 external links, a good picture, and it is interesting. Please don't delete it. Thanks -MC (talk) 01:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanna know WHO on earth wanted this page to be deleted?? —Ƿōdenhelm (talk) 01:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did it occur to you to read the deletion discussion before succumbing to your outrage? TastyCakes (talk) 23:33, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm outraged at your outrage about the outrage. This page is an important part of human knowledge, as it depicts an even better example of the very process of how star constellations came about (in the sense of us depicting something out of a natural feature). — ᚹᚩᛞᛖᚾᚻᛖᛚᛗ (talk) 21:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not only that, as I point out in my note below, this feature was discovered via Google Earth, as part of a new form of Earth exploration. The Sydney newspaper article references this directly. 68.146.81.123 (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nitpicking, but I'm not sure 'Earth Exploration' is the right term. Perhaps 'Earth Appreciation' would be more fitting. Judging by the fact there are roads visible in the area, it's pretty certain that it's been 'Explored' previously.Khan Tiger (talk) 03:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google Earth

I could have sworn this article used to include references to the fact it was discovered using Google Earth. I have put this back; everyone one of the sources cited mentions this, so why doesn't the article? 68.146.81.123 (talk) 01:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't the Google Earth image used?

Any sources out there come from the Google Earth image, so why not use that here also? Dream Focus 03:32, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's because it is not a free image, and probably doesn't qualify under fair use. I don't think you'll find google map images anywhere on Wikipedia for those reasons. But I'm no expert, please feel free to ask the people here for guidance on this. TastyCakes (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Badlands Guardian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Badlands Guardian. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140328103501/http://www.canada.com/globaltv/edmonton/story.html?id=977b4fcb-81ad-4c44-bbfa-baaa800c6dc5 to http://www.canada.com/globaltv/edmonton/story.html?id=977b4fcb-81ad-4c44-bbfa-baaa800c6dc5
Corrected formatting/usage for http://indigenousmapping.net/the-news/youtube/53-bg2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]