Talk:Badjaling, Western Australia

Australia: Places / Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Badjaling, Western Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Western Australian Wheatbelt: Railways

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Western Australian Wheatbelt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Wheatbelt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Western Australian WheatbeltWikipedia:WikiProject Western Australian WheatbeltTemplate:WikiProject Western Australian WheatbeltWestern Australian Wheatbelt articles
	This article is supported by the Railways component project.

Stacey train

Re: [1][2][3]

The text of the reference clearly says in two places "Stacey" train, with quotation marks around Stacey and not train, no possessive apostrophe, and no capitalisation of train (excluding the title, which uses title case). If the reference is wrong (as alluded to here), then please provide a different reference. Mitch Ames (talk) 01:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mitch, get creative - have a look yourself... use trove, try the variants. JarrahTree 01:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

have a look yourself — "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material...". I suggest that it would be more efficient if you wrote the articles to match the references that you supply in the first place, and/or cited references that match what you write in the article. Mitch Ames (talk) 02:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

to quibble over the details of the trove lifted reference son the subject is missing the point, the sub editors who made the headlines in the 1940s and 1970s were not waiting for a grammatical analyses in the 2020s, a very sad way to spoil other peoples edits, and days... JarrahTree 01:53, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To worry about the grammatical structure and analysis of reference titles is bizarre:

"Train For Farmer". The Daily News. Western Australia. 14 October 1946. p. 8 (HOME EDITION). Retrieved 25 January 2020 – via Trove.

J.S. Battye Library of West Australian History (1979), Stacey's Lamb Train, retrieved 25 January 2020

Charlesworth, Helene Barr (1993), The Stacey lamb train, H.B. Charlesworth, ISBN 978-0-646-14236-4

"Lamb train". The Beverley Times. Western Australia. 11 October 1973. p. 1. Retrieved 25 January 2020 – via Trove.

"'Stacey' Train on Monday". The Beverley Times. Western Australia. 9 October 1964. p. 2. Retrieved 25 January 2020 – via Trove.

"The Quairading Meat Train". The Beverley Times. Western Australia. 10 October 1963. p. 4 (A DISTRICT NEWS SUPPLEMENT PREPARED FOR THE BEVERLEY TIMES). Retrieved 25 January 2020 – via Trove.

"Train For Farmer". The Daily News. Western Australia. 14 October 1946. p. 8 (HOME EDITION). Retrieved 25 January 2020 – via Trove.

and that is not even considering http://railheritagewa.org.au/archive_scans//displayimage.php?pid=253 who insist in their wisdom 'stacey lamb train'.

JarrahTree 02:00, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]