This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christianliturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I've added the {{unreferenced}} tag to the article, because having a footnote attributing the information to "various sorces" is not referencing. You have to list the sources you take information from.--Carabinieri18:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of this. The book integrates the work of several authors, but does not list a managing editor, or equivalent position. The main source mentioned, and the one from which most of the articles are directly derived, however, is Butler's Lives of the Saints. This website contains the text from an 1894 Lives hagiography of Bademus, and is word-for-word the same as the text in Little Pictorial Lives, my source. So, instead of rewording my current citation to emphasize that Butler is the only source, I will instead credit the website, the upshot being that at least the source will be more transparent. I trust that this will rectify the issue. Even so, I'm curious what Wiki policy would be for sources that do not list all contributors (Little Pictorial Lives puts it this way: Compiled from Butler's Lives of the Saints and other sources). It seems a terrible waste that these sources not be used at all. Alekjdstalk19:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Use part of the expanded template, the "| format = " or "| others = " parts, and just skip the author. It's nice, and admittedly easier, when sources line up perfectly with templates, but they don't always, so just bend them a bit to make them work. People can figure it out from there. Certainly they can figure out a compilation when it's stated as such better than they can figure out what "various sources" (which also has the unfortunate side effect of making you look too lazy to do it properly) is supposed to mean. -Bbik★00:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]