Talk:Baddiley
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment Report
[edit]- Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
- Infobox to be added (use Template:Infobox UK place.)
- Photos need to be added.
- References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
DDStretch (talk) 02:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Expansion
[edit]I've added some more to this page. I have a lot of images, and many more are available on Geograph, but I don't have print references to pad out the text.
I would suggest incorporating Ravensmoor into this page with a redirect until enough information is available to make a separate article. Espresso Addict 05:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, closer inspection of the parish boundaries at [1] shows that Ravensmoor is split between Baddiley and Burland, with the bulk of the housing being in Burland, while the older buildings including the Methodist Church appear to be mainly in Baddiley. It therefore probably does make sense to have a separate Ravensmoor article. Espresso Addict 17:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
For the geology and formation of Cheshire meres see: http://www.english-nature.org.uk/special/geological/sites/area_ID5.asp 82.163.45.158 22:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Baddiley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183457/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56874 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56874
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183517/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56875 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56875
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183542/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56876 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56876
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183624/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?&id=56872 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?&id=56872
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183636/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56871 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56871
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071107061747/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56877 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56877
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121019183711/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?pid=2&id=56873 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?pid=2&id=56873
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212180827/http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56878 to http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk/details/default.aspx?id=56878
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 24 October 2016 (UTC)