Talk:Bad originalism
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge with Originalism
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Originalism. -- Ferrylodge (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
This seems to me to be a POV fork, so I'm suggesting a merge. Originalism is a fairly long article, so it may be that what is really needed is some careful editing to note this concept in that article and then leave this somewhat in place. I'm not sure, though. Erechtheus (talk) 02:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree it should be merged. This is a POV fork.Ferrylodge (talk) 20:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Clarify please
[edit]This article needs to be made more clear and easier to understand. Also it is not clearhow prominent or notible this 'bad originalism' view is. Otherwise it should just be a 'criticism' section within the Originalism article. m.e. (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I agree that "bad originalism" is not a notable phrase - instead it is just another critique of originalism. --Enos733 (talk) 02:10, 21 July 2008 (UTC)