Talk:Bad date list

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bad date list article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Sexology and sexuality: Sex work Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sex work task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Proposed rename

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to Bad date list. Nobody seems to object to the proposed new title, but sentence case appears to be preferred according to policy at WP:NC#Article title format — Amakuru (talk) 19:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Bad Date Book → Bad Date List – This is the most commonly used title of these schemes. Bad Date List appears to be most commonly used title in US and overall in English speaking world. In UK, Ireland and Australia the title "Ugly Mugs" is most commonly used. Note: proposed by another editor, I moved this to the talk page so I could use the correct template. I am neutral on this. Boogerpatrol (talk) 20:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like the capitalization should be sentence case either way—Bad date book or Bad date list. Some organizations may refer to their particular lists as proper nouns, but the article discusses a general concept. --BDD (talk) 21:07, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. Bad Date Book may have been an actual book, but bad date list is simply a generic name and should not be capitalized. The article is not just about the "Bad Date Book". Apteva (talk) 02:56, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.