Talk:Baconnaise

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Bacon task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baconnaise has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 18, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Baconnaise appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 June 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Baconnaise is a kosher mayonnaise-based product that tastes like bacon, but has no bacon in it?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/June.

Wikipedia

This article was nominated for deletion on June 27 2011. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Baconnaise

This article contains a link to a product sold at one, online store, and as such falls into the category of WP:SPAM. --Oliver Twisted 07:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw the concern, as additional references and information were added to the article. CSD withdrawn. Cheers. --Oliver Twisted 08:37, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Baconnaise/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Newyorkadam (talk · contribs) 07:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC) I will review this :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 07:01, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

Quick-glance comments:

I mentioned some quick-glance comments to you on IRC.

Comments:

This sentence needs a rewrite. "Baconnaise, does not taste like mayonnaise and its strong flavors overpowers dips, salad dressings or fish dishes."

Done

Wikilink 'Bacon Salt]] using this wikilink text: '[[Bacon_salt#Bacon_Salt|Bacon Salt]]'

Done

I think this should say 'while making a joke' (not having) "In an interview with ABC News, Esch and Lefkow stated that they came up with the original idea for bacon products and their first invention, Bacon Salt, while having a joke about the subject over a meal at a diner."

Done

Wikilink Jon Steward

Done

"Lesie Kelly" should be "Leslie Kelly"

Done

What do you mean 'according to Bacon Salt'? Is Bacon Salt a person? Please mention who said it while representing Bacon Salt. "In 2010, John Stewart again lampooned Baconnaise with a fake clip of the billboard in Times Square that drew a response from Bacon Salt. According to Bacon Salt, there was plan to run an actual billboard ad, but it was declined by Comedy Central."

Resolved, it was the official response of the company. I fixed it to J&D foods official name and linked it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think a comma should be added here after 'costumes' and before 'and also': "Together, they created interest in their products by going to numerous sporting events dressed in bacon costumes and also used social networking sites to raise awareness of their company."
Wikilink Comedy Central

Done

Wikilink 'Winfrey'

Done

Since you never mentioned any ingredients, it shouldn't say 'Other ingredients', it should say something like 'Some ingredients': Other ingredients listed on the jars include natural smoke flavor and tocopherols.q

Resolved. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilink smoke flavor

Done

Please change "Will Goldfarb of Serious Eats reviewed Baconnaise" to "Will Goldfarb of the website [[Serious Eats]] reviewed Baconnaise"

Done

You mention Baconnaise Lite once, but never describe what it is. Can you do that somewhere please?
If you want to put quotation marks around 'Serious Eats', please do it in the above paragraph too. Also, please add a comma after 'Baconnaise' in this section. Also, please wikilink animal fat "Original recipes featuring different animal fat-infused mayonnaises, including Baconnaise were covered on the 'Serious Eats' website."

Done

This should say "water, and lemon juice." (you forgot the and). Also, please wikilink the foods in this article sentence: "The recipe includes crumbled bacon strips, liquid rendered bacon fat, canola oil, egg yolks, Dijon mustard with water, lemon juice."

Done

Please add some things under the 'See more' section. I know you have the Bacon portal, but maybe you could wikilink Bacon and/or other things :)

If it is linked within the article it should not be in the "See also". See also is supposed to be for related, but undiscussed aspects of am article. I also added links for Bacon Salt. So I think this is okay. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's it for now! Placing on hold, you have seven days to make these changes :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 18:53, 17 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

Fixed all those issues. How's it look now? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I dug up more information on the release and got the list of ingredients and expanded a bit more on the Baconnaise Lite matter, but the product is no longer sold so I stated that. Should be even better now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Right now I'm working with Chris on IRC. -Newyorkadam (talk) 02:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	After fixes, yes! :)
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Contains 17 references.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Contains many in-line citations!
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I don't see any bias.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Only recent edits (except for one) are from ChrisGualtieri, the Good Article nominator.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	One image in the infobox of a bottle of Baconnaise. Image is from Flickr and released under the Attribution 2.0 Generic license which is allowed on Wikipedia, However, the image is blurry, low-resolution, and small. Try to find another image please :)
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Image is definitely relevant to the topic, it's a photo of a bottle of Baconnaise. Image doesn't have a caption; it doesn't need one, but it certainly can't hurt.
	7. Overall assessment.	Nice job Chris :)

Final decision comment: Passed! Nice work Chris :) Thanks for putting up with my strict reviewing :) -Newyorkadam (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baconnaise. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402203243/http://www.king5.com/video/featured-videos/Oprah-helped-put-Baconnaise-on-the-map-122477694.html to http://www.king5.com/video/featured-videos/Oprah-helped-put-Baconnaise-on-the-map-122477694.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:09, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]