Talk:Backlash (1999)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Backlash (1999) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Professional wrestling Mid‑importance

	Backlash (1999) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too Long

I suggest cutting the article down majorly. The event description should only tell the key points. The same goes for the background.--WillC 21:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an In Your House

I have provided a video from youtube of the intro and a poster showing that this in fact was not an In Your House pay per view. I have also watched my copy and no where in it do they say In Your House. The title of this should be changed to simply Backlash 99. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.108.214.154 (talk) 09:41, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Backlash: In Your House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Backlash: In Your House

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Backlash: In Your House's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Facts":

From Backlash (2005): "WWE Backlash 2005 Results". Hoff Co. Archived from the original on 17 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-30. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
From Backlash (2003): "WWE Backlash 2003 Results". CompleteWWE.com. Archived from the original on 11 April 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-28. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
From Backlash (2008): "Backlash (2008) Information". HoffCo. Archived from the original on 2 May 2008. Retrieved 2008-04-28. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backlash 1999

Backlash 1999 was NOT an In Your House PPV. Yes, the poster that was released months earlier does say In Your House on it, but at some point between the poster's release and the actual PPV itself, WWE dropped the In Your House name. If you watch the PPV, and even the episode of Sunday Night Heat that preceded the PPV, not once throughout the whole event is the name "In Your House" mentioned. Not by the commentators or wrestlers and not even an on-screen graphic. Also the cover of the original home video release does not say In Your House either. Every other In Your House from May 1995 until St. Valentine's Day Massacre has the name shown on screen, mentioned on screen and it's included on the cover of the home video release. I feel this page should be moved to simply "Backlash (1999)". OldSkool01 (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've filled an WP:RM request below and added mentions of the event being originally an IYH per the poster, similar to how Roadblock (March 2016) was originally "March to WrestleMania: Live from Toronto". FMecha (to talk|to see log) 14:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @OldSkool01: I know I am a bit late to this discussion but I just checked the WWE Encyclopedia and it does list the last In Your House as being "In Your House 28: Nacklast" on April 25, 1999. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 16:29, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nacklast you say? Ok. In all seriousness that means nothing. A book released over a decade later is irrelevant to the fact that on the day the PPV took place it was not called "Backlash: In Your House". Retroactively, WWE can say whatever they want. They change history all the time to fit whatever narrative they're trying to tell at the moment. OldSkool01 (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - haha whoops. Nacklast aparently, yes. I am not saying it was officially called an IYH, but if they called it that before and after its not retroactively changing the name. It just appears to add a bit of inconsistency. It also means that "(originally titled Backlash: In Your House on early promotional posters)" is not really a valid secondary title, perhaps it should say sometimes referred to as. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 20:33, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 February 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 19:13, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Backlash: In Your House → Backlash (1999) – Per User:OldSkool01, Backlash '99 was not an In Your House subtitled pay-per-view despite poster on article, although an IP dating back from 2009 claimed similarly. (I've since added notes on PPV and IYH pages about the event being originally an IYH event but later debranded, similar to how Roadblock (March 2016) was originally "March to WrestleMania: Live from Toronto".) FMecha (to talk|to see log) 14:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: If these PPV events fall under WP:NCTV, then (year) disambiguation alone doesn't comply. -- Netoholic @ 00:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:PW/MOS I think applies, but I found no mention of year disambiguation there; additional rules may apply. FMecha (to talk|to see log) 06:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - No comment atm on this, but just pointing out that WP:PW/MOS is not a guideline. --Gonnym (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Not sure what issue there is with this, but this seems pretty open and shut to me. The name of the event is “Backlash” and it took place in 1999. And since there were many other Backlash events to follow in subsequent years, such as Backlash (2000), Backlash (2001), Backlash (2002) and so on, this event should be listed as simply Backlash (1999). Just like every other yearly WWE PPV event is listed with the event name followed by the year in parenthesis. OldSkool01 (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- These do not fall under WP:NCTV. Although they aired on TV they fall under live event, not TV. That is why you do not see the title in italics as well. - Galatz גאליץ ^{שיחה Talk} 13:03, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - That makes sense. While the live event did air on Pay-per-view and therefore was viewable on television I don’t think that’s enough to make this a TV related topic.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 16:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support It’s consistent with the other Backlash articles and since this was a live event and not a program designed for television I don’t see any reason that the WP:NCTV applies.--69.157.252.96 (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, what is the hold up here? Why is it taking so long to move this article? There is zero reason to not move it. It’s been over a month since I suggested the move. Let’s get this done already. OldSkool01 (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Dr Death 2002.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]