Talk:Back to the Future (soundtrack)

High pitch

Anyone else notice a very high pitched noise on the Overture track? --blm07 02:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bttfs.jpg

Image:Bttfs.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Van Halen Song

Am I to take it that no one knows the name of the Van Halen song? Sarujo (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice long time for a response.... The EVH song is an untitled composition . I suppose the interesting part (to a VH fan) is that it was not written specifically for BTTF, but was originally included in the 1984 film The Wild Life (which co-starred Lea Thompson). Also, The Wild Life was scored by EVH between the VH albums 1984 and 5150, so if you listen to 5150, a lot of what you are hearing are riffs and such he took from his scoring sessions. DFS (talk) 03:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Back to the Future: Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901125817/http://videos.movie-list.com/view_video.php?viewkey=298bb9930789c8ed59d4 to http://videos.movie-list.com/view_video.php?viewkey=298bb9930789c8ed59d4

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:43, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Andrewa (talk) 21:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Back to the Future (soundtrack) → Back to the Future: Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack – Article title should match album title The k nine 2 (talk) 18:46, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:14, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The k nine 2 and Sdrqaz: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The k nine 2: Is this an uncontroversial technical request? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars previously moved the page to its current location in April. Sdrqaz (talk) 18:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A now blocked editor (User:Sudipto Surjo) was making a number of similar moves without discussion. This article had been at the current title since December 2017. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sdrqaz: Not sure why the page was moved to the current title, since there is no edit summary and no mention of it in the talk page. Other film soundtrack articles also follow the same format of using the full soundtrack album title, e.g. Back to the Future Part III: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack and Titanic: Music from the Motion Picture.The k nine 2 (talk) 21:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are also other film soundtrack articles that follow the parenthetical disambiguation: Interstellar (soundtrack), Star Wars (soundtrack), and Soul (soundtrack). Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, I was not aware of other soundtrack albums using the same parenthetical format.The k nine 2 (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: WP:NCALBUM says Use either "(soundtrack)" or the full name of a soundtrack for soundtrack albums. WP:NATDAB says that natural disambiguation is preferred to parenthetical: Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title. I don't feel like looking up whether reliable sources use the full name enough for it to be a good NATDAB. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I often wonder why soundtrack albums use a descriptive name with a disambiguation instead of the actual name of the album. "Back to the Future" isn't the name of the album. We use full names in every other place, and soundtracks shouldn't be any different. Gonnym (talk) 11:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, there are many examples where the opposite is true. Borat Subsequent Moviefilm, NASA, Marat/Sade, and Dr. Strangelove are all shortened versions of the actual name. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 12:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
so? Gonnym (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You said "We use full names in every other place" and I was just providing examples where that's not the case. But like El Millo said, my examples weren't as relevant because they have no need of disambiguation. Bait30 ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 16:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Those examples aren't valid because the shortened versions don't require disambiguation. The valid examples are all soundtrack articles that do use the disambiguation instead of the full title of the album. —El Millo (talk) 20:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: my concerns were purely procedural, as it was listed at technical requests despite the page having been moved to its present location from the new intended location a few months ago. I have not formed an opinion on the substantive matter. Sdrqaz (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. Also, this article contains much more info about the soundtrack of the film itself as well the soundtrack album, plus there's a whole section on the album release of just the score. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:03, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Most soundtrack articles follow this format. The proposed natural disambiguation also has to be a common name if it is to be used. —El Millo (talk) 18:22, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – I've put up a notice at WT:FILM for input, as the consensus here may set a precedent for other similar cases. —El Millo (talk) 20:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I don't see any benefit at all in taking 6 words to say what can be said with 1. (also: wp:commonname) I honestly have never understood the need to fix things that aren't broken. — Ched (talk) 22:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose most readers/people would consider any soundtrack to be "Film Name's soundtrack" and probably aren't very aware of it being called "Original Motion Picture Soundtrack/Score"/"Music from..." etc. So in that sense, "[Film name] (soundtrack)" seems to be the proper titling. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.