Talk:Back to Tennessee (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hey there, I'll be reviewing this article for potential GA listing. I've noticed a couple of things that could be improved, but overall it seems like it's coming on nicely.

Thanks for reviewing! I suppose this hasn't shown up on the nominator's watchlist, but I took a look at it and hopefully satisfied your concerns. Liquidluck✽talk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A citation needs to be added in the introduction after "The song well received by contemporary critics", not to mention there is a grammatical error in that very sentence. Later in that sentence it also goes onto describe the chart success, this also requires a citation.

I gave the article a complete copy-edit and hopefully fixed everything. I believe the article complies with WP:LEAD in that it the lead doesn't need citations because all facts mentioned in the lead are mentioned again and cited later on in the article. The facts you mentioned are cited in #Critical reception and #Chart performance. Liquidluck✽talk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of getting the cover art in the article too?

I wasn't able to find the cover art anywhere. Most reviews use the cover of the album by the same name, but I don't know if that's the "official" cover (there was a sentence in the article that said it was, but I wasn't able to verify it and deleted it). Liquidluck✽talk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My only other qualm is that in the 'Music Video' section, I feel that too much detail is gone into there. Perhaps just a link to the video would suffice, as opposed to commentating on the sequence of events in said video (particularly the description of what he is wearing).

I cut down the description and took out the clothing descriptions from both it and the live performances section. Liquidluck✽talk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As for the rest though, particularly the references, it all looks great. Nice work, I'll be checking back over the next week or two to see how things improve.

Thanks for the review, and for keeping the review open until someone could fix your concerns! Liquidluck✽talk 02:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: TheStig 20:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer for this article has stopped editing; can someone wrap this up? Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:41, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks fantastic. One thing, if you remove the italicization of the online sources, this is ready to go to GA-world. Let me know once done. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for finishing up the review! liquidluck✽talk 22:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]