Talk:Back (disambiguation)

Requested move (October 2010)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back (disambiguation) → Back — Would change Back from being a redirect to Human back to being the disambiguation page. 75.142.152.104 (talk) 00:49, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to oppose. The common sense primary topic is the anatomical back. A quick look at the links to the page seem to indicate the majority intend the anatomical part. The only other use remotely close would be the sports usage, which is more typically used with a modifier such as fullback, halfback or quarterback. older ≠ wiser 13:54, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move (December 2010)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Kotniski (talk) 13:07, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Back (disambiguation) → Back — Relisted. Macr86 (talk) 14:50, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please move this page so that the search term "Back" comes to this? Thanks for your help: this is the first time I've tried to do this. Macr86 (talk) 02:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

The traffic statistics you quoted only show views of Back. At least that's what it says on the page. Where does it say 'entered from the text box'? As I've mentioned before, you would always get a high ratio of Back to disambig, as the various club articles did not disambiguate their own links to the human back. I've changed the articles to not do the redirect, going directly to the human back. The hits for Back would go down and a more valid comparison could be made. Although I'm not sure that it is even relevant. Macr86 (talk) 02:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

'Comment' Back should redirect to torso. 184.144.170.217 (talk) 05:48, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. --JaGa^talk 05:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no clear reason given for move. Powers ^T 19:46, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.