Talk:Bachelor's Grove Cemetery

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

comments

How about knocking off the Chicago part of the title .. i.e a rename? maxrspct in the mud 18:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As no one has replied... I agree, gone JanderVK

Pond

What about the adjacent pond? 71.68.15.63 07:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other Notes

Here are some things I have learned about this site having done several investigations there. I know that Wikipedia does not allow original research, so somebody more devoted to this article may wish to confirm the following with proper citations.

The cemetery is still technically open to the public, but only during the day. Night visits, no matter how well credentialed or professional looking your group may be, will still provoke a police response. Even press credentials fail to cut the mustard.

The cemetery itself is in several separate legal jurisdictions. Officers from each of the separate departments patrol the area and can arrest you there. None of the various jurisdictions however claim to have the jurisdictional authority to grant access at night. If you ask one, they will refer you to another in a never ending loop.

The fenced-in area of the site does not contain all of the original grave yard. Some graves lay outside of the current fence. Many of the grave markers you may find outside of the fence however are just as likely to have been moved (vandalized) outside from within the fenced area. Some claim that Al Capone buried his victims at Bachelor's Grove ohohoh! In a serious note, there also are mysteries of the deaths in the well.

Ghostly photo

http://graveyards.com/IL/Cook/bachelors/ghost.html Would it be possible to use the ghostly photo in the article? --RyanTee82 (talk) 07:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced

It seems most of the information in this article links back to the same two web pages which make several claims with no citations or corroborating data. The sites clearly repeat any outlandish claim ever made about the cemetery, which is fine for those web pages, but should probably exclude them from being used as a reliable source of information. I suggest that all citations to those sites be eliminated from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.98.77.11 (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FTN

In case anybody is wondering about recent editing activity: There is an ongoing discussion about this article on WP:FTN. --Hob Gadling (talk) 07:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]