Jump to content

Talk:Bacchic art

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Statue not a satyr?

[edit]

The picture showing what purports to be a satyr does not appear to represent a satyr, in that the figure has human legs, rather than goat's legs. The picture is too small for me to see whether or not the figure has horns, but I suspect it's not a satyr. Can anybody say different? J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 15:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See satyr - most ancient satyrs are shown with human legs in fact. Johnbod (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you learn something new every day! Thanks. J. D. Crutchfield | Talk 19:21, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]