Talk:Bacchi Tempel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 00:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 00:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)`

 

Many thanks for taking this on. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:28, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

---

Observations

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• Well scribed

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• Article relies on Lönnroth to a large degree. Lönnroth's evaluation of Breitholtz on JSTOR points to over emphasis on borrowings from mythology by Breitholtz - which is an observant conclusion.
• This doesn't come off as a notable poetic work of any particular strength. For example, there is no compare / contrast / evaluate against other forms of narrative poetry (if these could be adapted to a vocal presentation (meter) of alexandrines), Confusions among redactions and various editing and additions by the author bring about plots and side narratives wherein instead of the participants observing and reporting on the progress of the (Presentation) end up describing their own side adventures.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• NPOV is preserved in this article.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

• Page created 14 December 2019
• Page has 81 edits from one editor and two bots...
• 90 day page views = 183 with a median of two views daily;
• Page history shows no edit warring; page is stable.

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• File:Bacchi Tempel title page 1783.jpg = public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1926.
• File:Temple of Bacchus Painshill by Elias Martin 1770.jpg = public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1926.
• File:William Hogarth Beer Street detail.jpeg = Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
• File:Bacchi Tempel.jpg = public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1926.
• File:Böljan sig mindre rör.jpg = public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1926.

 

 Passed