Talk:Baby Richard case

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementWikipedia:WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementTemplate:WikiProject Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacementAdoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement articles

Untitled

Just a question: what are the races of the people involved? Anybody know? KimoBoy 07:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both biological parents are Eastern European immigrants. The adoptive parents were white. KB

Accusation of Bias

Sheggia put the following warning of bias in the article, when it should be on the Talk page. The way to correct for bias is to edit to correct it, not put criticism of the article atop the article. Rcade

[Warning—this article appears to be strongly biased toward the birth parents' points of view, with factual content strongly contradicting that presented in multiple legal publications. Review of legal scholarship about the case presents a much different perspective. Note that the primary external link redered below (though misdirected) is for a book on the subject by Karen Moriarty, a family therapist whose counsel tends to disfavor adoption. Readers should be warned that this material is unreliable and suspect as presented, both factually and in terms of its clear bias.]

See The American Bar Association article at http://www.abanet.org/irr/hr/sp99bonina.html See also the University of Illinois Law Review, 1996.

Source?

What is the source of this information? I recently read an article in a 1997 issue of Ladies Home Journal with very different information about the case. ~Lily —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lilyfyrestorm (talk • contribs) 05:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

cleanup?

I've removed the cleanup tag, since the article doesn't have any spelling or grammatical errors and reads fine. I can only guess that someone mistook "cleanup" for something else - POV, sources, etc. Natalie 21:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]