Talk:Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Expanding the Article

I saw this was a 'start article' -could it be worth discussing the controversies around the BFHI? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karal23 (talk • contribs) 11:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Older Article Merge

Baby-friendly hospital has existed for a long while... think about merging the two or shrinking the hospital one. Gorton k (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internationalise this article

The WHO/UNICEF Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative is a lot bigger than the UK... this article should be expanded to include international statistics, and the information regarding the initiative in the UK be put in a Baby Friendly Initiative in the UK section.

Sources of information:

http://www.babyfriendly.org/ not sure if this is updated very much, but it looks like the "official" site... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorton k (talk • contribs) 10:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.unicef.org/nutrition/index_24806.html the UNICEF International page on the initiative
http://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/bfhi/en/index.html the WHO page on the initiative
http://www.euro.who.int/nutrition/Infant/20020730_2 the WHO Europe page on the initiative

Gorton k (talk) 12:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Friendly Initiative (UK)

I have discussed this with the UNICEF UK BFI web editor, this is what he said - "because there is no web ‘ownership’ of Baby Friendly in the global scheme [and BFI UK do have a strong web prescence], the question of merging is a tricky one. Really, each country’s programme should have their own page as an offshoot of the main BFHI entry, much like the list of individual country committees."

We suggest keeping the UK BFI page but making the information on it more specific to the UK Programme and linking it to the BFIH International article, as the programme operates differently in each country. UNICEF UK (talk) 11:14, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so we need an article on the international WHO/UNICEF scheme at Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative, into which should be merged Baby-friendly hospital, and a separate page for the UK scheme? Maybe at Baby Friendly Initiative (UK) or something... and the international page should maybe list and link to national schemes. Gorton k (talk) 12:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Friendly Initiative (UK) now exists, and I've added all the UK-specific stuff from the original article. Now this article needs some proper internationalising! I'll also fix the link in the UNICEF UK article... Gorton k (talk) 13:54, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160420183341/http://www.unicef.org.uk/Media-centre/Press-releases-archive/More-Scottish-women-give-birth-in-UNICEF-UK-accredited-hospitals-than-in-rest-of-UK-leading-to-more-mothers-successfully-starting-to-breastfeed-their-babies/ to http://www.unicef.org.uk/Media-centre/Press-releases-archive/More-Scottish-women-give-birth-in-UNICEF-UK-accredited-hospitals-than-in-rest-of-UK-leading-to-more-mothers-successfully-starting-to-breastfeed-their-babies/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]