Jump to content

Talk:Baar Baar Dekho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protected edit request on 29 August 2016

[edit]

Baar Baar Dekho: more than eye candy http://dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/20-Sep-16/baar-baar-dekho-more-than-eye-candy Baar Baar Dekho builds on some iconic literary and cinematic work: Dickens’ Christmas Carol, as well as the critically acclaimed movies It’s a wonderful life and Groundhog Day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.203.156.211 (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anshika dixit (talk) 08:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC) Storyline[reply]

'Baar Baar Dekho' is a love-story, which unfolds through flash-backs and flash-forwards. Recently actor Sidharth Malhotra has revealed that, the movie has a unique and has a very unusual storyline. The film is neither science fiction nor does it revolve around time travel. The styling is currently underway. Film has started in 2015 September for which Katrina and Sidharth had shot in London.every day jai gets 4 years older through an mathmatical equation.

Not done: Anshika dixit, please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The film hasn't been released, so any summary is speculative unless it comes from a reliable source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 08:20, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 September 2016

[edit]

Movie review: Baar Baar Dekho: more than eye candy http://dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/20-Sep-16/baar-baar-dekho-more-than-eye-candy Baar Baar Dekho builds on some iconic literary and cinematic work: Dickens’ Christmas Carol, as well as the critically acclaimed movies It’s a wonderful life and Groundhog Day


94.203.156.211 (talk) 16:22, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would probably say in addition, it's a vague blurb with little use. Are we saying that the critic thinks it's written better than these? Or that there's more stuff happening? Or what? Is this a compliment or a criticism? Is the critic alleging plagiarism? It's really unclear what purpose the quote will serve, which is why we shouldn't be focused on harvesting quote blurbs, but using quotes to explain how critics felt about things like the actors' performances, the writing, the direction, the cinematography, and so forth. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]