Talk:Bač (name)

Quite typical that my article about the Hungarian name consists every important information about the Slavic and Romanian origin, but in this one you omitted the Hungarian infos. That's your idea about NPOV? Zello 16:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see any evidence that the name exists today in Serbia. I think about similar ones that the commercial Hungarian websites I linked. In lack of such evidence the Serbian name is not "seldon used" but obsolete. Zello 17:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about wrong intro, I was copy that from your article. :) Now is corrected. Regarding the first comment, what exactly you suggest that we include here? PANONIAN (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But there it was sourced :) I the other article I mentioned that the name exists in Slavic and Vlach also, but here I don't see any hint that a similar name exists in Hungarian. Zello 22:52, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bač (name). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090116054846/http://fallingrain.com/world/a/B/a/269/ to http://fallingrain.com/world/a/B/a/269/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]