Talk:BT-20

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (the page does not meet the listed cases: There is no primary topic among the two; actually the link to the extant page cannot be primary in any case, because it is via a redirect. There is already one extant linked page. Apart from this formal argument: a) The second link likely will be to an extant page in the future. Actually there is nothing linking to this page, because I already disambiguated those links to point to T-20 (cell line) b) The speedy-deletion ruling, together with early deletions of stubs, makes it in some situations impossible to have certain "small definitions" appear in the Wikipedia.) --Tomdo08 (talk) 18:40, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 August 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Dab page will be deleted and replaced with a hat note on the primary topic article. Cúchullain ^t/c 15:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BT-20 (cell line) → BT-20 – Move over the current disambiguation page, which is not required (WP:2DABS). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:03, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very obscure tank should not get equal billing._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 07:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, clear primary topic as the only one with an article under this title. bd2412 T 20:33, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.