Talk:BRT Standard
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the BRT Standard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Update(s) needed for the "Scored BRT Corridors" section
[edit]I read that San Bernardino's sbX Green Line has earned and ITDP Bronze ranking on the BRT Standard. This ITDP announcement/article was written in April 2014, so I'm not sure how that would integrate into a chart that seems list the BRT Standard rankings as of 2013. Perhaps someone who is more familiar with this Wiki article could do the edit?
Anyway, here's the source article: https://www.itdp.org/san-bernardinos-new-sbx-green-line-is-latest-example-of-true-brt-in-the-us/
And who knows? Perhaps there are others to add to the list? This is just the one that came to mind for me. Alika|Alex 18:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Unreferenced and misleading entries in "Scored BRT Corridors" section
[edit]Many entries have been added to the table, with inaccurate or incomplete information, and no references. I have cleaned up a few entries, but many more need work. Also, one or the other of "BRT System" and "Corridor(s)" is missing for many entries. If the entire transit system listed is BRT then there is no need to list all the corridors or lines, but otherwise the listings are misleading. Please help clean up the table and add references if you can. Reify-tech (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)