Jump to content

Talk:BMW 8 Series

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:BMW E31)

Model chart

[edit]

The 8-Series is not included in the model chart for BMW! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.196.189.121 (talk) 14:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CAD

[edit]

Is there any justification for saying that CAD was unusual in 1989? It was first used in BL in 1985, or before, and I am pretty sure Lotus were using CAD in 1989 Greglocock 08:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I remember reading, a long time ago, that Nissan were using Cray supercomputers in the design of their cars as far back as the mid-'80s Jason404 (talk) 02:48, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Production figures don't add up

[edit]

The article is a bit of a mess. It states that 30,000 8-Series were produced worldwide, yet the figures in the table at the bottom don't add up to anywhere near that amount. Also the article says the car was introduced in 1989, yet in other places it states 1991.Davez621 (talk) 11:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

brilliant design

[edit]

The most beautiful BMW model , brilliant contribution of Klaus Kapitza! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jovanmensa (talkcontribs) 13:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New 8 Series

[edit]

BMW is rumored to have plans to revive the 8 Series, it may be coming out in 2010 or in 2011, it is going to be a 4-door coupe that competes with the Porsche Panamera, Aston Martin Rapide, and Mercedes-Benz CLS Class. It may also be true that it will be launched at the IAA Frankfurt Auto Show in 2014 for its 25th Anniversary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by UncleMikhail (talkcontribs) 02:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison to Mercedes CL

[edit]

I've checked all of Road & Track's reviews of the BMW 8-Series. They make no mention of it being designed to compete in the marketplace against the Mercedes CL (the CL is considerably larger). The single model it was compared to was the Porsche 928, and in the US market that was its main competetor. If you have references showing that this car was designed to compete with the Mercedes CL please post them, otherwise this reference will be deleted. Ken keisel (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://thearticlewriter.com/autowriter/bmw-8-series-gone-but-not-forgotten/
    Triggered by \bthearticlewriter\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page heading image shows non stock vehicle

[edit]

Aftermarket wheels have been fitted. Perhaps an image showing the car on stock wheels would be more appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.8.10.2 (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 June 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 21:03, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


BMW 8 Series (E31)BMW 8 Series – There was only one generation of the 8 Series, so it is currently at a needless disambguator. Whilst there was a concept car that used the 8 Series name, I do not see why that should mean this page requires a disambiguator. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 15:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on BMW 8 Series. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:57, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal opinion?

[edit]

"But this is a design study that works and compared to the spy photography of the upcoming production 8 Series, it closely resembles the real thing." I think this sentence is a personal opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakurazz (talkcontribs) 11:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with that. The entire Second Generation section needs an update and clean up anyways. Toasted Meter (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

[edit]

I am not a huge fan of the photo in the infobox currently, I thought the old one was nearly perfect, the only thing that gives me pause are the AC Schnitzer wheels, which I like but are not representative of the car as originally delivered. The car in the new photo also has AC Schnitzer wheels. The same problem is present on the 8 Series page where the car has Hartge wheels. I think the Alexandre Prévot photo would with a bit of cropping Be very nice. Toasted Meter (talk) 13:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Old photo with AC Schnitzer wheels
New photo with AC Schnitzer wheels
New photo with Hartge wheels
My proposed photo with BMW wheels

Your proposed photo is fine. Restoring it. U1 quattro TALK 07:01, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NEW (YouTube)

[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQhubbiE388 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.38.65.148 (talk) 00:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we care? The production car is now out, deliveries are starting, some video of the concept is not very relevant. Toasted Meter (talk) 02:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New proposal

[edit]

I would like to proposal a better picture for the infobox. Thoughts? --Vauxford (talk) 19:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original example, non reflective and no distracting background, the photo has been long used in other articles, I find this is a better example then the one Toasted Meter chosen.

I think the wheels look dirty and the car overall is a bit dingy. The reflections serve to accentuate the lines of the car, on the silver car the styling lines are a bit indistinct. Toasted Meter (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

True. The wheels are not even original BMW wheels. Previous image is fine. U1 quattro TALK 07:13, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Those are BMW style 8s, not aftermarket, they were factory fitted to the E31. The picture has problems but wheel originally is not one. Toasted Meter (talk) 08:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]