Talk:BIOVIA

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Why COI?

This article refers to WP:COI but fails to identify any e.g. WP:NPOV violations... WP:WHYCOI? -- samj _in ^out 17:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As seen in the edit summary to this edit:

These Changes are made by Accelrys Inc. Please do not attempt to change the content

there were clearly {{COI}} concerns at one point in time. These concerns have largely been removed by subsequent edits therefore I have now taken the COI banner down. Boghog2 (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so lets leave this discussion here for the time being just in case they recur. Putting the {{COI}} tag on the talk page is another option for less severe/inactive cases. Thanks! -- samj _in ^out 05:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continued COI editing

This article and those of Accelrys' products have been substantially edited by Accelrys employees and partners. These include, but are not limited to: User:Stooof, User:Nicksfcole, User:71.6.23.26, User:Rohit2008, User:Hzhou-accelrys, User:67.52.158.60, User:67.52.158.62, and MANY more. The trail of COI is overwhelming and would be a fun witch hunt. Krushia (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accelrys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140529085425/http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/oct/24/tp-accelrys-buys-aegis-analytical-for-30m/ to http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/oct/24/tp-accelrys-buys-aegis-analytical-for-30m/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Accelrys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105155408/http://www.mbtmag.com/products/2012/09/accelrys-offers-new-integrated-accelrys-process-management-and-compliance-suite to http://www.mbtmag.com/products/2012/09/accelrys-offers-new-integrated-accelrys-process-management-and-compliance-suite

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possible page renaming

Since Accelrys has been eaten by BIOVIA, it might be useful to rename and move the page and bring it up to date... anyone have thoughts on this? Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 20:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BIOVIA is not the name of a company but is a brand name owned by Dassault Systèmes which they use for their chemical software. It was introduced in 2014 when Dassault bought Accelrys."Dassault Systèmes Introduces BIOVIA". 21 May 2014. Retrieved 14 June 2020. As such, I believe that the correct action would be to merge this page with that for Dassault Systèmes. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]