Talk:BBC London

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

~~It should really be BBC London. Therefore we should move the detail from BBC London News but keep what is already at BBC London.Wikiwoohoo 21:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)~~[reply]

Untitled

*Merged manually on November 24th, 2005. Wikiwoohoo 16:51, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Linked Articles

The news reporters are linked to their own individual pages from this article. After a look through the articles are similar and there is inconsitency with a lack of articles for other reporters. Therefore I propose that a seperate article be created entitled 'BBC London Reporters' or something to that affect. Any objections to this please post in the immediate future and I will bring about this change, if no objections, in c.1 week --W022a 17:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite a good idea but maybe it would be better as List of BBC London Presenters and Reporters if put into effect. This would then mean small articles that are currently stubs could be merged into that instead, though individual articles on presenters/reporters are added to the BBC newsreaders and journalists category which makes them easy to get to. Your idea is good though and can be added to. Wikiwoohoo 14:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you hereby suggesting that we keep the current articles however we create another that has all the articles contents within the individual stubs or redirects from stubs names to the combined article? --W022a 18:46, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was suggesting that where biographical articles are small stubs, they be deleted but only after the content is moved to the list article I suggested. Larger biographical articles should be left untouched, though a summary of the content should be entered for each journalist's section. How does that sound? Wikiwoohoo 19:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me! I have had a go at creating the new combined article, located through the link above. It is by no meants perfect and you may wish to adjust/tweak the article [if keeping it] before removing individual articles. A few points you may wish to clarify withing the article first are: - Any forgotten presenters - A picture next to the contents, the area looks very bland! - The names of the two traffic & travel girls. Cheers --W022a 15:43, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got off to a good start! I'll make improvements and add content soon. If you'd like to know the names of the presenters such as those doing traffic reports, you can check the BBC London website or take a look at the BBC London section at TV Newsroom Wikiwoohoo 19:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have spent last hour making some modifications. I think all the details on the presenters are there, with the exception of Victoria Hollins whose details are unlocatable! Neither links give any description of the reporters, thus I intend to make notes whilst watching the show as to provide a list with descriptions of the articles they cover, perhaps put the list under just one section as no individual details can be found - nor are they as valuable as those of the presenters W022a 12:04, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Radio programming

I've just added a new sub-head on radio programming, but the headings/su-headings could do with be broken up in a slightly more common sense way: ie TV news, radio music/news and so on. 'Radio programming' is worth its own section as it's a 24 hour rolling stationand I hope other eds will add to it. Any thoughts? Escaper7 13:55, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LDN

"The programme's original title was BBC LDN, perhaps a too-clever attempt by BBC insiders to foster the tri-media identity by applying the abbreviated ident for BBC London 94.9 which appears on the displays of RDS-equipped FM radios."

It has been noted elsewhere that LDN is "text speak" for London. AdorableRuffian 22:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Home of BBC London

Is BBC London located in Television Centre? -Paolo-210.5.105.36 04:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Marylebone High Street in London's West End, prior to that it was based at the BBC's Elstree centre (actually in Borehamwood), Hertfordshire. Escaper7 05:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article split

I suggest. This Article Shall Split Unto BBC London And BBC London (television news)--JSH-alive ^{talk to me}_{see my works}^{mail to me} 08:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Wikiwoohoo 16:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just seized the initiative. There is now the following:

This article, dealing with the region itself.
BBC London News - dealing with, evidently, BBC London News (previously a redirect to here).
BBC London 94.9 - the article for the radio station, exactly the same as it was before.
BBC London (disambiguation) - a new article linking to all of the above.

Wikiwoohoo 13:39, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBC London News within BBC Breakfast

" BBC London News can be viewed throughout the UK during BBC Breakfast and on the BBC News Channel at 6:28, 6:58, 7:28 and 7:58."

Is this statement correct? I live within the BBC East region and get BBC East news during BBC Breakfast.

I know technically I could receive BBC London News if I chose to watch the BBC London version of BBC1 on my Sky box, but the statement above seems to imply that analogue / digital terrestrial viewers see BBC London News regardless of where they live....

Any other wikipedians out there care to clarify which version they receive?ColourSarge (talk) 16:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BBC London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120723083954/http://tvnews.thetvroomplus.com/news-143.html to http://tvnews.thetvroomplus.com/news-143.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]