Talk:B67 and B69 buses

Trains: in New York City / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

Buses: New York Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as Low-importance).

Routings:

1874: didn't exist yet
1898: Fulton Ferry or South Ferry to 9th? and 20th via Water, Washington, Concord, Adams, Fulton, Boerum, Atlantic, 5th, Flatbush, 7th, 20th
1906: Park Row or Fulton Ferry to 9th and 20th via Fulton, Flatbush, 7th, 20th; South Ferry to 7th and 20th via Atlantic, Flatbush, 7th
1916: Park Row to 7th? and 20th via Sands, Adams, Boerum, Atlantic, Flatbush, 7th; South Ferry to 7th? and 20th (rush hours only) via Atlantic, Flatbush, 7th

Merging the B67 and B69 pages

My fault for not doing this earlier, but I want to propose merging the B67 and B69 pages. They share around half of their route together, and have interlined frequencies and share a timetable with each other, and considering that other route groups that share this share a page, I was thinking the same could happen for the B67 and B69. Ex696 (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ex696: support; sounds very reasonable. Klbrain (talk) 19:36, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 13:55, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Sigh. This is on me-I had mentioned opposition to this elsewhere, but with school kept forgetting to get back to this. I feel that the routes (and their streetcar histories) are distinct enough to warrant separate articles. The merge was somewhat sloppily done, and does not distinguish the two separate lines. If the merge is kept (and there is a valid argument for it), another name would be needed-it doesn't specify the B69 route (and it seems like we would need to add clarification that they would be NY routes). Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 16:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kew Gardens 613, I agree regarding the merge. The way it is now, the B69 takes a metaphorical backseat to the B67, when in reality these should be described on equal footing, similarly to the other combo articles like B61 and B62 buses.

If there's no opposition to retaining this merge, I'll move the page to B67 and B69 buses, too, while we think about a permanent name. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:04, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]