Talk:B3 (classification)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 17:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
Comments
- "disability sport classification for blind sport" can we remove one of the "sport"s?
- It is not used outside of sport, so not entirely certain. --LauraHale (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- I meant something along the lines of "disability classification for blind sport"? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- My misunderstanding. Fixed. --LauraHale (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
- I meant something along the lines of "disability classification for blind sport"? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- It is not used outside of sport, so not entirely certain. --LauraHale (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Worth a link to visual acuity.
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- There's a specific link for blind judo (redirects to Paralympic judo) and you could link Paralympic association football#Football 5-a-side instead of just regular 5-a-side football.
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "classification is LTA-B3. athletics where the comparative" probably should be a comma.
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Is there a reason our IBSA article calls it "International Blind Sports Federation"?
- Fixed link. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "This classification was first..." reinfroce subject, i.e. "The B3 classification was first..."
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "functional and evidence based" -> "functional- and evidence-based".
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "though the B3 class is comparable to the IBSA created class" I thought the B3 was the class created by the IBSA?
- Clarified the wording.--LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Could link clapstick.
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "whereas cycling and skiing do require a guide." -> "...skiing require one."
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 11:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Could link visual field.
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "The International Blind Sports Association (IBSA) defines..." and "The International Paralympic Committee" both of these have already been abbreviated in the preceding section, so use the abbreviations.
- Not sure. Fixed link so it was not to a redirect. --LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "This classification has parallels in other sports. For adaptive rowing, the comparable classification is LTA-B3.[10] For athletics, the class is T13.[11][12] The B3 equivalent for swimming is S13.[5]" merge that into the previous paragraph and reinforce "The B3 classification has parallels..."
- Done. --LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "During the actual evaluation" no need for "actual".
- Removed. --LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- In general, there seems to be a lot repeated in this section from the lead, so perhaps trim the lead down a little.
- Trimmed. --LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Define and link FINA before using the abbreviation.
- Fixed.--LauraHale (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- 2008 Summer Paralympics is overlinked.
- Fixed. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Image caption does not need a full stop.
- Fixed. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "recognised" vs "meter" vs "utilized " - which variant of English is being used in this article?
- Changed to American. My bad. I generally do UK/Aussie but obviously not paying as much attention as I should. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "This classification traces its history"... "The B3 classification..."
- Fixed. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- "When a cyclist is looking for a guide, they are encouraged to find one with a pace similar to their own" seems like common sense to me. Does it need to be reported here?
- Yes, I think so because it is a point that comes up in literature about what is desirable for looking for in guides and then how you improve from there. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- The portal graphic is squashing all the references up, could it be placed elsewhere?
- Not sure. No see alsos and no external links where they might otherwise be placed. Can remove. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Check reference titles for correct use of WP:DASH i.e. date ranges etc should use an en-dash, not a hyphen.
- Confused because my knowledge of dashes and hyphen usage is non-existent. --LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Also, references which are PDF usually have
format=pdf
.
- Fixed.LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Be consistent with author names in the refs, e.g. is it First Name Surname or Surname, First Name?
The Rambling Man (talk) 11:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed.LauraHale (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Not a bad start, I'll put it on hold while the comments are addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: