Talk:B. J. Prager/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

The website is showing up twice in the infobox and the brackets are showing.
- I have been requesting that the website parameter be fixed for weeks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He led his high school team on a 13-game win streak [1] could be good to add.
- Added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:12, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"In 2010, Ivy League Rookie of the Year Mike Chanenchuk totaled 28 as a freshman." did he go to princeton, or another ivy league school? If the latter, Prager's school record would at least still be intact.
- Clarified.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The profession career section should be able to be expanded. There's the stat site in the infobox as well as [2] a good amount in google news from what it looks like.
- In terms of local news coverage, he scored enough goals over the course of his career that he got mentioned in a lot of articles. I don't think noting every hat trick is really appropriate. What we need are important post season and all-star goals and truly spectacular games. I added his five goal game. Not so keen on adding four goal games.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article on hold. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Part of me is still reluctant to pass this just because of how short the article is. That being said, I have looked through the sources, and beyond the passing mentions in game recaps, there is little tangible to be added in. The last point is fair, since there's a fine line between adding in stats and overburdening the article with them; I know I've done the latter on some of my baseball ones. Really the only issue if the shortness, that doesn't mean it's not comprehensive. What it does do, however, is pass all GA criteria, and as a result I will pass the article. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]