Talk:Bärenfang

This article was copy edited by Wahrmund, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 20, 2012.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Spirits Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spirits, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spirits or Distilled beverages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpiritsWikipedia:WikiProject SpiritsTemplate:WikiProject SpiritsSpirits articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spirits WikiProject task list:

This list is transcluded from the tasks page, to edit it click here.

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Spirits:

Tagging all articles that fall under our scope with {{WikiProject Spirits}} and assessing their quality and importance to the project.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The former East Prussia had no mountains.

What do mountains have to do with booze? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.228.8 (talk) 07:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Being a German I believe bear catch would be a better translation. "Der Fang" would be "the catch", so this would seem to make far mor sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.50.200.21 (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picture Quality

Trying not to get in an edit war here...

User Wahrmund and I have a disagreement about which picture looks better. I feel that my picture (left) is the better representative. Wahrmund feels that his (right) is better.
A bottle of Bärenjäger, a brand of Bärenfang produced in Germany and bottled at 35% ABV.

I would like the community's thoughts on this issue. Thank you for your time! WDavis1911 (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest the leftmost image, it has not the over exposure, and vibrancy of the image on the right, which doesn't look as authentic. Hope this helps! Huckleberry113 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:30, 3 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Clearly the picture on the left should be used as our work should most accurately reflect the item being described.--Craiglduncan (talk) 17:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rightmost image doesn't have glare over writing though. Just my opinion. --^{SteelersFanUK06} HereWeGo2010! 01:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rightmost image has too unrealistic colors to be used, but leftmost has a glare. Not sure what is the easier to solve for a graphic editor. --Anneyh (talk) 08:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The image on the right is the better quality image, but it needs a color adjustment. The white balance of background needs to be adjusted so that it is more white and less yellow, which will improve the color of the entire image. This is very easy to do - takes about 1 minute with Photoshop.Vapeur (talk) 11:36, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought about that btw, and I tried but the problem is that the base colors are actually missing. I.e., the underlying color information is actually missing, not just off-balance, so I wasn't able to reintroduce it to a realistic hue. WDavis1911 (talk) 17:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please see the adjusted picture which I have placed in the article. Perhaps this will suit better. Wahrmund (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The tint from the surroundings is gone, but it is still not right. In the picture on the left, you can see that the leftmost character has an outfit consisting of red, brown, green and yellow. The leaves in the middle are a vibrant green. This is missing in the one on the right, even the newer one. I don't like the glare in the photo on the left, but I think that is minor compared to the lack of proper coloration in the photo on the right. I could photoshop the glare away, but I don't like doing that (levels, contrast and such I have less problem with, but I don't like going beyond those things). I'm glad we are getting outside opinions on this. I just have to think that a picture that shows the true colors of something, even with small lighting artifacts, is a better representation than a picture which is substantially and irreparably hue-shifted. WDavis1911 (talk) 19:28, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barenjager sRGB 1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Barenjager sRGB 1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 23 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Barenjager sRGB 1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Name

This article should likely be renamed Barenjaeger as opposed to Barenfang. I am under the impression that in the United States it is sold only as Barenjaeger. While I can not speack to Britain, Canada, etc., for the English version of Wikipedia, ultimately the English version of the name should be the primary article name.Nicholas Nastrusnic (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2019 (UTC) correction: Barenjager Nicholas Nastrusnic (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]