Talk:Azteca Records
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:AztecaRecord.jpg
[edit]Image:AztecaRecord.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Requested move 25 March 2016
[edit]This discussion was listed at Wikipedia:Move review on 21 May 2016. The result of the move review was endorsed. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved now that the other article has been restored (non-admin closure). — SSTflyer 10:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Azteca Records (California) → Azteca Records – There are no other articles on Wikipedia about subjects called "Azteca Records", so disambiguation is unnecessary. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose this stub
is mixing up 2 labels already, there is a third label in Mexico under Azteca TV. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- After a bit of fixing, this could be the same label. Doesn't change the fact that the (Mexico) label still exists and is probably better known. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Confused – The proposal sounds plausible, as the "(California)" doesn't seem to clarify anything unless there's another one somewhere else. Are there several such organizations in different places, or not? Whether there are other articles on WP is only a trivial part of the question. Dicklyon (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
- Comment only. The reason this is at "Azteca Records (California)" is because of "Azteca Records (New Jersey)" (now deleted). Azteca Records and Azteca Music are not affilated. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 08:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
- I restored Azteca Records (New Jersey), as it did not seem to meet a valid criteria for speedy deletion, and tagged it as an {{Orphan}}. wbm1058 (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Requested move 23 May 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved as uncontroversial. SSTflyer 15:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Azteca Records (California) → Azteca Records – Azteca Records (New Jersey) was deleted in 2007, then undeleted 9 years later, and finally deleted again at AfD. The disambiguation page is not needed per WP:TWODABS. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:16, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy now the other one has been deleted. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy per nom. Azteca Records of New Jeresy is deleted, so no need to disambiguate. CookieMonster755 📞 ✉ ✓ 21:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy per nom, and probably per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC anyway. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
- Stub-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Stub-Class Los Angeles articles
- Low-importance Los Angeles articles
- Los Angeles area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Stub-Class Latin music articles
- Low-importance Latin music articles
- Latin music articles
- Stub-Class record labels articles
- Low-importance record labels articles
- WikiProject Record Labels articles
- Stub-Class Regional and national music articles
- Low-importance Regional and national music articles
- Closed move reviews