Talk:Aymer de Valence, 2nd Earl of Pembroke/GA1

GA Review

Hi there, this article quite comfortably passes GA. I have a couple of suggestions for further development below but congratulations of the new GA.

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

There are a few instances of colloquial tone in the article but the writing style is in general quite high.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

I'd be interested in more information on his military career in Scotland at Loudon Hill and Methuven, but overall all aspects are well covered.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)