Talk:Ayla (Chrono Trigger)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Who is Michael P Williams. I see he wrote books in the past but I don't know if he's credibly or note-worthy. He's the only source I'm not sure about.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I'll be reviewing this article. This one shouldn't take long.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source is more uplifted through the publisher, Boss Fight Books, rather than Williams himself. Basically as though he wrote for IGN or Polygon. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 09:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. in that case, it does seem like a note-worthy mention. I'll give it a pass now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:15, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]