Talk:Avocado toast

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Avocado toast article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 March 2017. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Australia: Queensland Low‑importance

	Australia portal Avocado toast is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

Sections/ Subheadings

Would it be useful to add more sub headings to better describe things like the origin and variations of this topic? It just seems like a really large block of text that could use some spacing out and refining. (Aearlim (talk) 19:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vaish200. Peer reviewers: Nbuend.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reads

Great, informative article, however tends to read as more of an essay over an encyclopedic entry. The subheading suggestion above would be useful, perhaps more use of smart paraphrasing as well over the insertion of as many quotations as there are? FocusUp1979 (talk) 03:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting article, however there needs to be sub-topics to discuss more in-depth information regarding the topic, as it comes off as a long summarization and less encyclopedic. Nbuend (talk) 03:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good informative article. It may be better if the content was summarized further and broken down into subcategories, and not as quotation-heavy. The lead could also summarize the article's content rather than introduce it.--Harkiret (talk) 00:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There could be a sub topic of how avocado toast has become a part of pop culture. An example is Actress Gwyneth Paltrow releasing a whole cook book on Avocado Toast. here's a link: http://www.refinery29.com/2016/04/108113/gwyneth-paltrow-its-all-easy-cookbook-interview Maybeitschris (talk) 22:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well yes, there could be such a sub-topic, but is it really the business of Wikipedia to have sub-topics on all of the things Paltrow develops a thing for? By all means, create a sub-topic on a Paltrow Wiki entry, and cite avocado on toast, then link that to this page.... if you have a thing for giving the woman and her bizarre books publicity, that is.93.158.36.21 (talk) 00:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with the extensive removals made by the prior editor, without discussion. Much of this content is sourced to high quality sources like The Washington Post and The New Yorker, and its removal had the particular problem of removing much of the context for this food's increasing popularity in the U.S. Also, the change of a section title to "Media hyperbole" seemed to violate NPOV. This article can surely use improvement but please let's do it through orderly discussion, not by evisceration. --Arxiloxos (talk) 02:26, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise describing it as "Controversy" is NPOV, as the article referenced was clearly silly banter. Broadly is not a high quality source and contained inaccurate details. 93.158.36.21 (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Salt's first article may have been tongue-in-cheek, but the resulting controversy was not. Did you read the additional sources past the first article? --122.108.141.214 (talk) 03:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unrefs

So there were three sentences that stuck out in the article when I read it. Strangely, all three were statements about times and places where this food was eaten. None cited.

Why were they in three different locations?

Mexico and Australia
Chile
Solihull

I think my edit was a compromise... the rest of the article is well written, looks like it is relatively well sourced (I didn't check them, just that the citations exist where they should), and I didn't want to destroy the first paragraph... Not sure about having an unverified claim as the first sentence (after the lede). But I only wanted to make the technical changes, so I call for assistance as to what to do about that first sentence.

Is it appropriate for the first sentence to potentially violate WP:NOR ? Angryredplanet (talk) 06:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TL;DR: Guacamole on bread is popular in the USA now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.124.116.101 (talk) 18:03, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Professional Writing

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 7 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madtownsend (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Eaturvegeez (talk) 19:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am planning to make edits to this article over the tone and organization of the article. I am currently working on it in my sandbox and plan to publish it soon. Madtownsend (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)madtownsend[reply]