Talk:Avnillah-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 04:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

in Design, "limited by the Ottoman Empire's limited" perhaps change one to "restricted"?
- Works for me
in Characteristics, where were the 75 mm QF guns mounted? Did she originally have a secondary battery?
- The sources don't say, unfortunately.
suggest centring the Laid down and Completed columns in the table for consistent appearance.
- I'm not sure if that's possible with merged cells
  - Done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ah, I have quite a few articles to copy that template over to! Parsecboy (talk) 01:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
link Constantinople
- Done
worth pointing out in either the table or text that both Thames Iron Works and Samuda Brothers were in London, from the name, I assumed Samuda was a local yard until I followed the link
- Good idea
which Gio. Ansaldo & C. yards were they rebuilt at?
- Added
worth mentioning and linking/redlinking the two armored cruisers that sank Avnillah, I assume this information is available and they would be notable?
- Good idea
suggest using the NHHC licence template for both images, along with PD-USGov-Military-Navy
- Done

That's me done. Placing on hold for these points to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]