Talk:Averell Smith

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Citations needed and other stuff

Yes, work in progress, but find citations for statements of fact or remove the statements. I removed all mention of the not-yet-published book, and shorted the article by more than 20% in attempt to make it less laudatory. David notMD (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, true. When the book is published, you might add a link to the Google "preview", here. -- Hoary (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos for adding refs. However, #2 is an interview (frowned upon), and also does not support the factual statement immediately preceding it. Ref 3# DOES mention the campaigning for McGovern at 13, so use that. David notMD (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

and also

What's the meaning of "peer-based board of directors"? And perhaps one should clarify the distinction between (A) originating such-and-such (which an organization, I think primarily of adults, did) and (B) leading it (which we're told students do). -- Hoary (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When in doubt, take it out. David notMD (talk) 13:52, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the consulting firm SCN

"the consulting firm SCN" → "a consulting firm"

How is this edit an improvement? (It came with no explanatory or other edit summary.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the firm belongs in the Career section, along with a reference confirming that Smith was a co-founder. David notMD (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"a lot of unreferenced content"

Theroadislong, you added:

{{AFC comment|1=There is a lot of unreferenced content [[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 12:37, 10 March 2018 (UTC)}}

to this article when it was a draft. I've just now removed this, not because the article no longer has a lot of unreferenced content (I think it has a lot less than the earlier draft did, but I haven't really investigated), but instead simply because (rightly or wrongly) it's no longer a draft. If it merits a different template to a similar effect, feel free to slap this on. -- Hoary (talk) 23:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ref #2 is an interview. Can a different ref be found to support the text? Ref #9 has only a one sentence mention of Ace being hired to do PR on the project, with no description of what he did. David notMD (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]