This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
@YoungForever: You didn't really give a proper explanation. It is not displayed that way on Showbuzz Daily. It is in a column and says "571" not "0.571". It's common to do decimal points because MOS:TVRECEPTION says if an episode is over 1 million, everything should be rounded to the nearest hundredth (e.g., 1.01). None of the episodes are above one million here. Why does there need decimals for something when it doesn't even need to be rounded?? The template has an option to remove "millions" for a reason... Heartfox (talk) 05:24, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As I stated, it is common practice to display in decimal point(s) even when they are under 1 million for U.S. viewers either to hundredth or thousandth. "0.571" is rounding to the nearest thousandth and there isn't anything wrong with that. — YoungForever(talk)05:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably only common practice because people don't know you can add "viewers_type=" and change it. I don't care about this article, but I mean come on... who in real life uses 3 decimals points to write a number when you can just write it normally. Heartfox (talk) 07:10, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Page squished into middle of screen with 50% of sides unused.