Talk:Availability heuristic/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LauraHale (talk · contribs) 07:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article is just not ready for a nomination. The article is NOT fully supported by sources. It has article tags in the article suggesting areas that need improvement that the nominator does not appear to have addressed because here they added unsourced information. The article appears to use primary sources, which is not compliant with WP:MEDRS. The article is a series of lists. (Which suggests featured list would be better. The article has citation needed tags. These all need to be addressed and talked through on the talk page (especially the use of sources to insure knowledge of WP:MEDRS) before nominating again. These issues are large and I do not believe can be worked through in a week, especially considering the medical related issues and underlying structual issues. The fact that the main contributor could not get the article past WP:DYKs much lower criteria suggests to me they were not familiar with and did not care about the guidelines here either, just nominated because it was a class assignment.--LauraHale (talk) 07:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]