Talk:Autoflowering cannabis

Notes

This is a new page which we will be adding to on a daily basis. Autoflowering cannabis is so different from the photoperiod strains discussed on other pages that we feel it truly needs its own page. please do not merge this with cannabis cultivation

i am in the process of getting permission to post pictures which should liven things up some. Please do not make any changes to benefit your specific brand of autoflowering seed or vendor store. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisgedwards (talk • contribs) 22:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

regarding article deletion

Autoflowers are a notable subject, the online forums and seed market are a clear indicator of this. I apologize if the article reads like advertising, i will go through and add more of the concerns that people have about autoflowers in order to balance it out. If anyone wants to change wording so as not to change the content but to make it read more like an encyclopedia article, please do.

I removed the "reference" that somebody added which was obviously an ad. I put the world of seeds ad up because the website is referenced regarding abundance of these plants. i have nothing to do with the company. here is a quote regarding notability from a discussion on this article from autoflower.net a very active, free online public community.

"I'd hate to see it lumped in with general cannabis growing. People need to know these are different, have their own growing requirements and are at least equal, if not superior, to photos in many ways. I've got a stickied thread in the New Growers forum on the life cycle of autos. Would that be useful? user Muddy 1-15-2012 from: https://www.autoflower.net/forums/f16/new-wikipedia-autoflowering-cannabis-page-5767.html

Before going as far as deleting a meaningful entry lets allow some time for other to chime in on its importance or its lack of notability.

Chrisgedwards (talk) 01:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding updates to this article

A few quality edits, n0t by me, have taken place since the creation of this page, thank you for that everyone. however the picture was deleted, and i see no reason for this. please only contribute improvements to the article. please post to this talk page if you have any radical improvements or your editing has been removed and you feel it was not necessary to do so. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisgedwards (talk • contribs) 17:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:June 2011 Dirt - Ghaze x Dieselryder.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:June 2011 Dirt - Ghaze x Dieselryder.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:June 2011 Dirt - Ghaze x Dieselryder.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:18, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:1adragonsbrea.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:1adragonsbrea.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:1adragonsbrea.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:03, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No reliable sources

None of the listed references appears to be a reliable source. The lack of inline citations is not really an issue when the entry as a whole fails Verifiability. This apparent lack of reliable sources also brings notability into question. There's certainly no indication that this topic is notable enough to warrant it's own entry.

We will need to identify some reliable sources and establish notability in order to avoid nomination for deletion. Chondrite (talk) 06:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

change this part

someone needs to change this at the very bottom of the article "Autoflowering cannabis plants often have more CBD, a cannabinoid involved with the pain killing effects and sedation. The theraputic benefits of cultivating a plant with inherently higher levels of CBD is a no brainer for MMJ growers seeking a more narcotic effect.[citation needed]" there is no published research that backs this up, there is no source, and the "no brainer" part doesn't sound proper for an encyclopedia article. 68.188.200.62 (talk) 00:47, 28 October 2013 (UTC)sk![reply]

I have removed " The theraputic benefits of cultivating a plant with inherently higher levels of CBD is a no brainer for MMJ growers seeking a more narcotic effect", I agree re no brainer being unencyclopedic, plus why is it a no-brainer anyway, doesnt really make sense either♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 00:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the section and added a request for references when CBD is mentioned in the Advantages section. I see no need for a separate section on CBD, especially when there is no supporting source. Joja lozzo 02:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Autoflowering cannabis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Back to growth

Does it go back to growth after flower or does it die off 139.216.58.112 (talk) 04:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]