Talk:AutoGyro Calidus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AutoGyro Calidus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Merger proposal

Silly to have two articles on virtually identical aircraft!!!--Petebutt (talk) 06:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is a history here. The article was originally at AutoGyro Calidus, but was solely about the UK-modified version, not the German base model. Then an editor moved that article to RotorSport UK Calidus, causing AutoGyro Calidus to become a redirect. I wrote a fresh article on the AutoGyro Calidus and made links in both articles to each other. Certainly the RotorSport UK Calidus could be merged into AutoGyro Calidus as a variant, or it could be left as a separate variant article. I think the key determinant should be just how modified it is, but I haven't been able to find that out, even the CAA approval doesn't list the changes, although it does list RotorSport UK as the manufacturer, not merely as importer. If the changes are just a few placards or similar documentary changes then, sure, it should be merged. If the changes are some actual and substantial physical changes to the aircraft then the two articles could remain separate, particularly if over time the two designs diverge. The RotorSport UK website doesn't spell out the changes, either. I don't have the information to make that determination at the present. - Ahunt (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has now been a week since this discussion was opened. Since both articles link to and explain each other, both are in the nav box as well and there are no more comments I think we can close it as "no consensus to merge". If future information comes to light to indicate how similar or different these two aircraft are then perhaps we can revisit this issue. - Ahunt (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AutoGyro Calidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718042755/http://wwwapps2.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/ccarcs/aspscripts/en/quicksearch.asp to http://wwwapps2.tc.gc.ca/Saf-Sec-Sur/2/ccarcs/aspscripts/en/quicksearch.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]