Jump to content

Talk:Autism Network International

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ANI vs Autreat

[edit]

I see an article titled "Autism Network International" that is almost entirely about one of ANI's activities, Autreat. In the 90s, in particular, ANI was at least as noteable for its email discussion list (ANI-L) and, to a lesser extent, its pen pal directory and web resources. I am an autistic person in my mid-40s who joined ANI in 1993ish. I have never been to an Autreat (I live in Australia). 110.142.45.71 (talk) 04:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you by chance know if the email discussion list is still active? It seems like it isn't letting anyone else join it... Hook54321a 08:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Incident at Autreat 2013

[edit]

There was a incident at Autreat 2013, in which the accessibility needs of one attendee were misunderstood by another (who, besides being an attendee, was also one of the organizers). The resulting conflict was very badly handled, causing the first attendee to have a severe emotional and psychological reaction. After the event was over, the organizers, rather than acknowledge the problem, blamed the attendee whose accessibility needs were misunderstood. This has continued for months. Two main primary sources are: the official incident report from the organizers; the perspective of the first attendee (1st of 7 parts, see comments for links to the others). While I'm not aware of any secondary sources discussing this (yet), it did seem significant enough to at least mention it here on the talk page, in case others might be inspired to search for sufficient sources to justify including it in the article. JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

[edit]

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance. According to reliable sources (e.g., Autism, a Social and Medical History by Mitzi Waltz), ANI is of historical importance because it is the first organization to be run by autistic individuals. I realize that this sourced claim should be added to the article, but the article should not be deleted. CatPath (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion request declined. Wikigyt@lk to M£ 23:08, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined

[edit]

Requested move 28 February 2016

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline (talk) 13:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Autism Network InternationalAutreathttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Autism_Network_International on the AfD page, User:Markeer says that Autreat is a better name, and I am basically the only editor. Ylevental (talk) 20:58, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources for this title seem to have been added so probably no reason to change the name. My original comment on the AfD was based on a cursory glance for sources on my part, not an extensive study of the subject - Markeer 22:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Autism Network International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]