Talk:Austria's Next Topmodel

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Top Model task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Call-out order

You cannot put a call-out order table in this article, because only one episode aired! This table gives the impression Kim won the first cycle. If you add a call-out order table, then all must be gray. Please understand this, User Shameless

Ferdinand h2 (talk) 16:46, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it seems like you do not understand the concept of putting call out tables on NTM-related articles, it lists on which position a contestant was called in one episode and since the finalists got called in an explicit order in the first episode already I put it there - just take a visit on the pages of America's Next Top Model or GNTM for example. regards Shameless (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the difference is - the 2nd cycle of GNTM already aired - so we know the winner is Barbara. But ::Austrias Next Topmodel didnt finish yet - so we dont know if Kim will win or not.

It says "the contestant who won the competition" and then the color green. Next to Kim's name, there is the color green, implying that Kim won. But she didn't. So, you'd have to make all boxes gray.

It is called a "call out" table but no-one was called out yet!, so you can't say that all were called out and Kim won:::

So I made all boxes gray.

Ferdinand h2 (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ughh, you don't get it, "call out" means when there name was called out that they're STILL in the running. again: look on other pages to see how this works! nothing on the page so far implies that Kim won, she was called first on the casting episode. there is a color green box in episode 7 when the winner is supposed to be revealed and any girl's name from the top 10 can be first in line then. it is just you not understanding the concept of this table when it is not finished yet (because the season is still airing). Leave it this way! Shameless (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When they are still in the running, why does it say that some were called out already. It says "the contest who won the competition" and then the color green. Next to Kim's name, the box is green, imypling that she "won the competition". Each number at the top of the table represents one episode. Episode 7, the last episode of the cycle, has a green box beneath it and Kims name next to it. Again, this looks like Kim won in the final episode, as she has a green box next to her name under the number 7. And at the botton of the table it says "green box= the contestant who won the competition".

Ferdinand h2 (talk) 06:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not gonna discuss this anymore with you since it seems like you haven't even taken a look on this table twice. Kim's name is in line 1 for episode 1 where she was called first. The colorgreen box is not before line 1 in episode 7 - there are a lot of white boxes before that which are still empty! and again: call out does not mean the one who get's a call out is out - its just that the host said the competitors name!Shameless (talk) 10:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Austria's Next Topmodel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110427044512/http://www.kleinezeitung.at:80/nachrichten/leute/topmodel/2585719/schoenste-ganzen-land.story to http://www.kleinezeitung.at/nachrichten/leute/topmodel/2585719/schoenste-ganzen-land.story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]