Jump to content

Talk:Australopithecus garhi/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 03:52, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

[edit]

1. Prose  On hold

2. Verifiability  On hold

3. Depth of Coverage  On hold

4. Neutral  Pass

5. Stable  Pass

6. Illustrations  Pass

7. Miscellaneous  On hold

Comments

[edit]

1.

  • "and it is possible that though unclear if males" - I think this needs commas to set off the appositive. It just doesn't read well.
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Owen Lovejoy link is incorrect, you linked to a guy from the 1800s
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • A. afarensis is a duplink
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

8 "with 3 successive," - MOS:NUMERALS

done   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.

  • "625–9" - This is a page range, is it standard for the leading digits of the latter number to be lopped off? I don't see that much (I also mostly edit history articles), and it's a touch confusing to look at.
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 629–35." - Ditto as above
fixed. I see this format a lot but I don't like it so I usually change it   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3.

  • "The remains are dated to about 2.5 million years ago (mya)." - Is it known which method of dating was used?
added   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

4.

5.

6.

7.

  • The archaeologyInfo EL is dead for me.
fixed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Does the guy who made the Flickr image in the External links have any sort of qualification or subject-matter expertise? If not, I'm not sure if somebody's wild guess should be linked
added   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:56, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]