Talk:Australian twenty-dollar note

Numismatics Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Australian twenty-dollar note is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Will do more later, and the rest of the denominations. Enlil Ninlil 08:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Putting the notes in order

See Talk:Australian ten dollar note#Putting the notes in order.

Colour

This note is obviously red? Why do people say it is orange?

Images

Fair use rationale for Image:Australian Paper Twenty Dollar Note Security Features.jpg

Image:Australian Paper Twenty Dollar Note Security Features.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. BetacommandBot 04:43, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Charles Kingsford smith 20 dollar note front big.jpg

Image:Charles Kingsford smith 20 dollar note front big.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aud20p.jpg

The image Image:Aud20p.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Nicknames section

The article cites one reference for this section. It should be noted, however, that this reference is merely a radio poll conducted by the ABC. This is hardly reliable. The articles for the $5, $10, $50 & $100 notes have nothing. I'm therefore proposing that they be deleted. JIMp_talk·cont 04:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-res image is dodgy

Is it really such a fantastic idea to have this very high-res version here? In the other notes' articles, the notes for the images say: "According to http://www.rba.gov.au/CurrencyNotes/LegalFrameWork/representation.html permission to copy is not required as long as the image is not capeable of misleading people into believing the reproducion is a genuine banknote"

I think this is relatively capable of being reproduced in a shady way. Raena (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasons

Smith and Hargraves share another link - they were both Freemasons