Talk:Australian labour movement

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been selected for the Organized Labour Portal Article Of The Day for April 21.

Australia: Politics High‑importance

	Australia portal Australian labour movement is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Discuss links here

Editors regularly clean out undiscussed links from this article. Please discuss here if you want a link not to be cleaned out regularly. (You can help!)--VS ^talk 04:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality tags

We dont just go around slapping neutrality tags on articles for the hell of it when there are no fact tags or any discussion added to this page in conjunction with that tag. Timeshift 05:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World war One, Mannix, IWW and Conscription

It is commonly claimed that much of the opposition to conscription was due to the agitation of Mannix, it is questionable if this is so. Notably respected Australian labour histroian Ian Turner question it in his "Industrial Labour and Politics in Eastern Australia 1900-1921" questioned it, according to Turner more catholics voted for conscription in Mannix's home city of Melbourne than in Sydney. So it is hard toa rgue that Mannix had any effect. Maybe he had an unintentional pro-conscription effect! According to Turner farmers worried about labour shortages were a more significant source of "conservative" opposition to conscription. The Mannix factor is part of the folklore of the anti-conscription battle but if it is to be claimed as part of its history then a positive citation is needed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.84.5.211 (talk) 05:24:24, August 19, 2007 (UTC)

Union membership halved in 20 years: ABS

Relevant article from SMH - can't add info now but will return tomorrow if no-one else has picked up --Matilda ^talk 07:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Define 'militant'

I hit this article hoping to find out what people mean when they describe a union as "militant". I'm none the wiser. It would be helpful if it could be defined or linked through. It seems to me it's a pejorative term used by the anti-union movement to describe effective unions.--Russell E (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Australian labour movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091013075152/http://www.actu.asn.au/work_rights/news/1132030724_2357.html to http://www.actu.asn.au/work_rights/news/1132030724_2357.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bizarre 'early history' section

The section discusses UK labour law as it if applied after the colonies received self government powers starting in around 1860. Just a really bizarre and factually incorrect section. I will probably remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.158.36 (talk) 07:05, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]