Jump to content

Talk:Australian heritage law

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This is the main block of text that stimulated the "Essay like" tag. It's because it 1) is written like opinion rather than encyclopedic tone and 2) it's not cited:

Aboriginal Law within Australia is sometimes portrayed as an undue control on various sectors of the Australian Aboriginal Community. It Victoria the recent legislation was a direct attack by government to curtail Aboriginal artifact activities by various Aboriginal Organisations. It was a direct response by government to Landholder, Developer, and land Management organisations that were protesting over having to pay royalties to Aboriginal Peoples in the areas that the project were developing. This led to wide spread project holdups with the state over a 10–15 years period.
These organisations had the effect of holding up various government and private construction projects due to the nature of the Aboriginal Artifact materials found on many sites. The government decided to put into effect a schedule of rates and to appoint Aboriginal Organisations as being registered aboriginal parties (RAPS).
The schedule of rates was screwed down over 500% on what used to be paid for the same service before the Act.
The government effectively gutted the Victorian Aboriginal Cultural Heritage industry overnight. This was the whole point to the Victorian Legislation. To control the Cultural Heritage Industry, and to give in to pressure from developers, landholders, and government land management departments.

Is someone interested in finding citations for this information and rewording a bit to have a more impartial tone (e.g., "gutted", "direct attack", etc.) Phrases are opinion would be better put in quotes and attributed to the speaker. It would be good, too, to have balanced coverage of the information.--CaroleHenson (talk)

I came across this page while trying to quickly find something the history of legislation protecting Australia's heritage and it needs quite a bit of work to have at least the correct legislation and scope (not all of Australia's heritage is Aboriginal in origin). A few of us will be trying to improve this pageover the next few months. BTW Austli http://www.austlii.edu.au/ is a great reference source for legislation. Iain Stuart (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Australian heritage law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Australian_heritage_law&oldid=1205509425"