Talk:Australian Army ship Crusader (AV 2767)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 01:06, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Some minor bits:
   "Soutwest Pacific" should be "South West Pacific" in Australian English
   Use the Conversion template on horsepower
   Same with the tons of stores, which I presume are ship tons (40 cu ft)
   The infobox says 1,600 tons of stores but the article says 1,500
   Link "clinker" to Clinker (cement)
   

   All done. Nick-D (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All images are okay. I've added the AWM image template to one of them, as tends to avoid problems with lost links.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Thanks for the review. Nick-D (talk) 01:28, 20 January 2013 (UTC)