Talk:Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Will get to this review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 19:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

"Geoffrey Rush, foundation and current President of AACTA" What do you mean by foundation? If you meant founder, I thought he was just named the president?

"...with the inaugural festival to be held in Sydney and Melbourne from October to November in 2011.[18]" Since they presumably already occurred, the tense needs to change.
"...members of the Academy can commence voting for films in all categories, while members of the Institute vote for the Best Short Animation and Best Short Fiction Film only.[19][20]" So members of the Institute only vote for those two categories? That seems odd
Use consistent publishers links (compare ref 5 to 7 for example)
Use consistent date formatting (2011-08-30 vs 19 August 2011 for example)
Ref 15: deitalicize publisher
imdb is not a reliable source
Refs 1, 2, 4, 6, 16, 17, 26 need retrieval dates

Not too many major issues here. Always happy to see an awards-related article be nominated to GA. I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Please respond here when you have finished with the corrections. Thanks! Ruby 2010/2013 04:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review! I have made the changes that you pointed out in your comments. In regards to the "...members of the Institute vote for the Best Short Animation and Best Short Fiction Film only" part, it seems to be just those categories that the AFI members can vote for. All other voting privileges appear to be only for Academy members. But I did see that there is a members' choice award that AFI members can vote for so I added that to the sentence. Thanks again! DonEd (talk) 11:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article. Happy to pass this one. Keep up the good work, Ruby 2010/2013 22:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! DonEd (talk) 04:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]