Talk:Australian Aboriginal sign languages
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
TOC
[edit]Does anyone object to my placing __NOTOC__
in this article? The table of contents doesn't really seem to add much here, since the the article consists of the introduction (which doesn't appear in the TOC), a place holder for linguistics, a list of sign languages, a brief See Also, and a lengthy list of article references that takes up at least as much real estate as the rest of the article put together. I'll wait a couple of days to see if anyone feels differently. CKA3KA (Skazka) 17:47, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- I removed the table of contents. CKA3KA (Skazka) 01:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]There's a new poll here that would (hopefully) end all this "Indigenous" vs. "Aborigine" controversy. Feel free to vote. Zarbat 09:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- Mid-importance Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class language articles
- Low-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles
- Start-Class deaf articles
- Unknown-importance deaf articles
- WikiProject Deaf articles