Talk:Austin-Rover V64V engine
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge proposal
[edit]Undoubtably, both are the same design, why clutter Wikipedia with 2 articles about the same engines. Martin Brundle confirmed this in an interview with Motor Sport magazine. SpacedFarmer (talk) 14:32, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Support merger - I say go ahead and be WP:BOLD; this is quite clear and the content is minimal anyhow. Mr.choppers | ✎ 01:32, 10 July 2024 (UTC)