Talk:Auster AOP.9

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / British / European / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

AOP.9M

Does anyone have info on the AOP.9M? I've gone through the civil register, both R & D and there is only one aircraft owned by the chap mentioned. This is G-BUCI, and it sounds as if it may be spares for the AHAF aircraft. It does not (now, at least) have a Lycoming engine; nor do any others on the register. I also failed to find anything on the net.TSRL (talk) 14:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have added some refs for the 9M (or Auster 9 Modified, or Auster 9(M)), I understand G-AVHT was the only conversion. MilborneOne (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page now has more in-line refs. It could still do with authoritative cites on

line 1 para two of op. history, on the exploits of 656 Squadron

end of same para, on Beaver take over

on the AAC Squadrons' use of AOP.9s, post the transfer from the RAF in 1957. Where were they apart from Malaysia and Aden?

the numbers used by the Indian Forces (was it 10 IAF plus 25 Army, as some sources suggest) and what they were used for.

the SAF numbers, and their use.TSRL (talk) 21:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

656 Squadon operations in Malaya/Malaysia

The article currently quotes 'the aircraft . . . carried out . . . 143,000 (Firedog) operations'. The figure is confirmed in Thetford's Aircraft of the RAF since 1918 (page 42) but he says that '656 Squadron made over 143,000 Firedog operations'. The Squadron was in Malaya from 1948 onwards. The squadron received AOP.9s in September 1955. Ketley, page 50, says 'from the end of 1955, the squadron flew an average of 1,200 sorties a month, half of them in the communications role'. It is therefore clear that the 143,000 ops figure includes a majority performed by 656s previous AOP.6s. I will amend the article to that effect. RuthAS (talk) 21:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Auster AOP.9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]