Talk:Auschwitz (film)

What is it about?

is he actually doing a straight-forward drama?? --99.101.160.159 (talk) 21:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's more like a documentary. The first part is interviews with vocational students today who know next to nothing about the Holocaust, not even what century it took place in. Boll pretty much uses that as an excuse to next show us a 30-minute segment like straight out of Schindler's List, which is a straightforward re-enactment of a train arriving at the Auschwitz death camp, infants of the group being shot outside, the rest then being led to the "shower rooms" and gassed to death. Everything happening while the SS guards are idly chatting amongst themselves about their careers and colleagues. After that 30-minute re-enactment, there's another round of interviews, this time with students of better education, who can tell you a few more bits about the Holocaust than that first group at the start. --79.193.54.58 (talk) 07:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

is it anti-German propaganda? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.226.95.18 (talk) 09:18, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Boll is famous for controversial approaches, gore and exploitation. He is neither a historian nor a documantarian. For this movie he exploits the shoa and some pupils who unwittingly support a common controversy concerning Education in Germany. The first group is identified as pupils educated on a "Hauptschule" while the second group is identified as pupils from a "Gymnasium" commonly considered to provide the best possible education. In fact Boll himself states in an Interview here (https://www.welt.de/kultur/article10821778/Auschwitz-Film-schockiert-mit-brennenden-Kindern.html) that he also interviewed kids from a "special school" for the first segment. Considering Bolls work ethics(evident by his other movies) it is more than likely that he deliberately picked the worst statements while editing the movie. The interviews do not truthfully reflect the common grade of knowledge among german teenagers, and the reenactments provide no educational benefit beyond the schock-value of their brutality.79.214.116.209 (talk) 12:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Auschwitz (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319232433/http://oliblog.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=2604 to http://oliblog.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=2604

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]